What does Taylor's argument primarily emphasize as a remedy for inefficiency?

Taylor's argument primarily emphasizes systematic management as a remedy for inefficiency. In his approach known as Scientific Management, he focused on analyzing and optimizing work processes through observation and measurement. This means establishing standard operating procedures based on scientifically gathered evidence to improve productivity.

Systematic management involves breaking down tasks into smaller, manageable components, allowing for the identification of the most efficient methods. By applying this structured methodology, workers can be trained to perform their tasks in the most effective way, minimizing unnecessary motion and promoting efficiency. This discipline in management practices was revolutionary at the time and served as a foundation for modern industrial management techniques.

Other options, while they may touch on aspects of management, do not focus on the structured, scientific approach that Taylor advocated. For instance, extraordinary human resources suggest an emphasis on hiring exceptional talent rather than optimizing processes. Increased manual labor could imply simply working harder without addressing efficiency. Randomized task assignments would lead to inconsistency and confusion, which contradicts the goal of optimizing performance through systematic approaches. Thus, systematic management is the cornerstone of Taylor's solution to inefficiency.