What is one criticism of Scientific Management?

One significant criticism of Scientific Management is that it can lead to worker alienation due to the repetitive and standardized tasks it promotes. The principles of Scientific Management, developed by Frederick Winslow Taylor, emphasize maximizing efficiency through systematic analysis and optimization of work processes. This often results in jobs being broken down into simple, repetitive tasks that lack variety and creativity.

As workers engage in monotonous activities day in and day out, they may feel disconnected from their work and the overall contribution they are making to the organization. This feeling of alienation arises because employees might perceive themselves merely as cogs in a machine, performing tasks with little opportunity for personal expression or engagement. It can lead to decreased job satisfaction and motivation, ultimately affecting productivity and employee retention.

The other options do not accurately capture the main criticisms associated with Scientific Management. For instance, the framework does not focus on creativity but rather on efficiency and standardization, and it is actually designed to increase efficiency rather than minimize it. Additionally, while the approach does prioritize task efficiency over comprehensive employee training, that is not as direct a criticism as the issue of worker alienation, which has significant implications for workplace morale and effectiveness.